SIDI Tour Rain Boots
A narrow, well made boot
I have not worn these much, but I can say that they seem to be well made. Compared to my Alpinestars Web boots, these have more protection around the ankle. They are slightly lighter also. Unfortunately they are too narrow for me. I have other Sidi boots in the exact same size that are not too narrow, but I guess this model fits differently.
July 5, 2016
Let me start by filling you in on my left leg. I shattered it in a skiing accident this past January. Currently my foot and leg are still in recovery and finding a comfortable boot that I can get on has been a challenge. My first pair were a pair of Tourmaster Coaster WP boots. These were easy to put on and very comfortable. Unfortunately the sole and heel were too chunky to allow easy shifting on my BMW. I tried almost everything on and found these easy to get on and off plus the cut of the calf allowed my leg to fit as well.
I have only worn them once and can't attest to their durability but so far so good!
June 26, 2015
Runs small, order up oone size from normal
Great boot, sturdy and comfortable but even better service! Needed to up-size fast, due to an upcoming trip and Rev Zilla cane thru with 2-day shipping and pre-paid return.
I had new boots for the Georgia Mountain Rally.
May 18, 2015
Great rain-proof option
Awesome minimalist boot designed for the elements.
March 10, 2015
Typically great Sidi quality
Sidi quality is excellent. But! You have to know the European sizes don't directly transfer to American sizes. If you wear a size 10 like I do you cannot order a size 44 Euro--it will be too short. So you need to order the 45 Euro, which is 10.5 American to get the right length. But! If you have narrower feet than average like I do you then have to put up with having a boot that is a bit too wide for comfort. So what to do? I wear an extra bulky wool sock to fill the space and they fit fine. That, however, turns these wonderful Sidis into a three season boot because wearing bulky wool sox in the summer just won't do.
Having said all of the above this is my third pair of Sidi brand because of their quality, durability, and the fact that they keep my feet dry. Also it is rather cool/cold where I live so I can wear them more of the year than say in SoCal.
I'd rate these boots at five stars if I could get a pair that fit my narrower feet better.
February 23, 2015
First ride in these boots was a 700 mile weekend trip through Western Carolina mountains. It rained the first three hours and temps varied from 57 to 20. I supplemented with a pair of inner boot liners. I am happy to report that my feet stayed warm and dry the entire weekend. The boots are a little stiff but I expect them to break in well as other reviewers have noted and were comfortable to walk in the whole weekend straight out of the box. I was hesitant to spend the $$ but after wearing and testing them I highly recommend these boots. I cannot comment on durability but will say that they feel as if they will last the test of time.
February 2, 2015
Solid commuting boot with good protection and nice styling
These are excellent boots that make a comfortable commuter boot, with excellent protection and good styling that doesn't cry out motorcycle boot when worn under pants in the office.
I picked of these SIDI Tour Rain boots as a replacement for a warranty return of the Dianese NightHawk boots. The NightHawk boots were good boots except for some quality and durability issues (i.e. the thread on both zippers came apart after a little more than a year of daily commuting). That was unacceptable for a $240 pair of boots. I've also owned the SIDI Traffic boots. As both SIDI boots and the Dianese Nighthawk boots would likely find themselves on the short list for commuting boots, I'll compare them.
The SIDI Tour Rain boots are made of lorica, which I have found to be very durable and very resistant to scuffing (as opposed to the leather of the Dianese Nighthawk boots). My prior boots were SIDI Traffic boots, which were also made of lorica and have held up well for 5+ years of commuting. The downside of lorica, is that it doesn't breathe as well as leather/gortex boots. Lorica is initially stiffer than leather, but softens up with use. Initially, lorica looks synthetic, but as it softens up, it's hard to distinguish it from leather. If you prefer durability to breathability, go with lorica. For breathability, go with the leather/gortex version of the SIDI Tour boots.
The zipper on the SIDI Tour boots slides up easily without much stress on the zipper. The Dianese Nighthawk zipper is longer and tighter, so a little harder to zip up and seems to be a stress point. The zipper on the Nighthawk is the weak point of these otherwise excellent boots.
Based on my prior experience with other SIDI waterproof boots made of lorica, I don't expect any issues with the Tour Rain boots. The protective cover over the zipper provides me extra confidence that the zipper thread won't get too wet and fall apart, like on the Dianese Nighthawks.
The SIDI Rain boots are about 2" taller than the Nighthawks and Traffic boots, which provides for greater protection, especially on the shin. The downside to the taller boots is they are not quite as comfortable wearing all day long. They are taller than Crew socks (which tend to slide down a bit), so you may find the rubbing of the top of the boot against your leg a little annoying unless you wear taller socks that stay up. If you wear crew socks, you definitely need to make sure the hook part of the hook and loop closure isn't exposed against your skin when you put on the boot. I'll be getting taller socks to eliminate any of these issues.
I found the sizing chart for SIDI Tour boots to be right on. The toe box is not super narrow like many other italian boots. The Dianese are definitely narrower in the toe box. These are comfortable boots that will only get more comfortable as they break in. I find the SIDI Tour boots are more comfortable than the Nighthawks due to the wider toe box.
The SIDI Tour boots are much more stylish than the SIDI Traffic boots (i.e. less aggressive sole), but nothing is as stylish as the Dianese Nighthawks. The toe box on both the SIDI and Dianese boots is not very high (more shoe-like than boot-like), so easy to get under the shift lever.
The sole of the SIDI tour boot is not super aggressive, but provides good grip, except maybe on very wet surfaces (i.e. think do-it-yourself carwash). I think I was spoiled by the Skywalk soles of the Dainese Nighthawk, which have incredible grip, even on wet surfaces.
Overall, these are great boots for commuting and touring at a good price. If I had to purchase again, I might be tempted to pay the extra $100 for the leather/gortex version for better breathability, but the durability of lorica will keep these boots looking nicer much longer than leather.
September 22, 2014
wide in heel
I wear a 9.5 to 10 US depending on manufacturer Eur 44 usually fit me. I have a set of SIDI Vortice Air's that fit perfect. Eur 44, but have a cinching system. I have a narrower foot. B,C ie Puma/Asics fit me well. I ordered these in Eur 44 and the length and toe box was superb in fit, but the heel was way to wide for me. Other than that, nice boots with good features and protection. I sent these boots back and ordered a pair of GoreTex rain boots from another major manufacturer, size Eur 44, through Revzilla in the same price range that fit me perfectly.
July 19, 2014